4.7 Article

Exploring Multi-Use potentials in the Euro-Mediterranean sea space

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 653, 期 -, 页码 612-629

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.308

关键词

Multi-Use; Mixed-method approach; Analytical framework; Multi-level stakeholder engagement; Blue Growth; Euro-Mediterranean sea

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme [727451]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [727451] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

European seas are experiencing rapid development. The anthropogenic demand for marine resources and space exerts the need for novel concepts for sustainable resource exploitation and smart space allocation. Multi-Use (MU) is an emerging concept to overcome spatial claims and support Blue Growth, however its actual potentials and current status of implementation in different sea basins is to a large extent unexplored. An analytical framework using a mixed method approach is proposed for the identification and analysis ofMU potentialities in eight EU countries of the Euro-Mediterranean sea basin. The paper addresses opportunities and challenges of ten existing and potential MU combinations driven by three maritime sectors: tourism, renewable energy and Oil & Gas industry. Opportunities and challenges for MU development were presented in terms of drivers, added values, barriers and impacts. Results show that highest potential for MU development are related to tourismdriven MU combinations (e.g. pescatourism), but also emergingMU potentials exist related to Floating Offshore Wind energy and aquaculture (Gulf of Lion) and the re-use of Oil & Gas decommissioned platforms (NorthernCentral Adriatic Sea). Findings were discussed for their geospatial distribution and their policy, socioeconomic, technical and environmental boundary conditions. Recommendations on actions to foster MU development in the Euro-Mediterranean sea space are provided. (c) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据