4.7 Article

Effect of production temperature on lead removal mechanisms by rice straw biochars

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 655, 期 -, 页码 751-758

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.282

关键词

Soil remediation; Biochar; Lead immobilization; Adsorption; Precipitation; Production temperature

资金

  1. Opening Fund of National Engineering Laboratory for Site Remediation Technologies [NEL-SRT201702]
  2. National Water Pollution Control and Treatment Science and Technology Major Project [2018ZX07109-003]
  3. Thousand Talents Program of the Chinese government
  4. Tsinghua University
  5. Killam Trusts of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Production temperature significantly affects biochar properties and consequently the removal mechanisms of heavy metals. In this study, rice straw biochars were produced at 300, 500 and 700 degrees C (RSB300, RSB500 and RSB700). The influence of production temperature on the adsorption characteristics and removal mechanisms of lead on this set of rice straw biochars were investigated by batch adsorption tests, micro-structural analyses and sequential metal extractions. Biochars produced at higher temperatures had significantly higher pH values and surface areas, resulting in higher metal removal capacities and faster uptake kinetics. Precipitation was a key mechanism for lead removal from solution for all biochars: lead oxalate was precipitated on RSB300, and hydrocerussite was precipitated on RSB500 and RSB700. The immobilized lead fraction on the biochars could be divided into exchangeable, acid soluble and non-available fractions. RSB300 had 11.34% of the total immobilized Pb attributed to the exchangeable fraction, whereas for RSB500 and RSB700, it was < 1%. Immobilized Pb on RSB500 and RSB700 was almost exclusively attributable to the acid soluble and non-available fractions (> 99%). Based on our results, RSB500 and RSB700 are likely much more appropriate for soil remediation of Pb as compared with RSB300. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据