4.7 Article

Impacts of different types and intensities of El Nino events on winter aerosols over China

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 655, 期 -, 页码 766-780

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.090

关键词

Eastern Pacific El Nino; Central Pacific El Nino; Aerosol concentration; Severe haze day

资金

  1. key National Natural Science Foundation of China [91644211]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0203306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

El Nino is a strong signal of interannual climate variability. The occurrence of an El Nino event may have an important impact on atmospheric pollutant concentrations in China through changes to the regional climate. This study quantitatively examines the differences among the effects of different types and intensities of El Nino events on winter mean aerosol concentration and severe haze days in China. It is found that Central Pacific (CP) El Nino events lead to larger increases in the aerosol burden over southern China relative to the same intensity of Eastern Pacific (EP) events. For El Nino events of the same type but with different intensities, moderate events induce large increases in surface aerosol concentrations over the entire eastern China, while strong and weak events lead to obvious decreases in the surface aerosol concentration over northern China. These differences are mainly attributed to changes in atmospheric circulation, with the resulting changes in aerosol mass transport occurring in response to the different types of El Nino event. Except for moderate CP events, all kinds of El Nino events lead to an increase in severe haze days in winter over northern China. Strong and weak EP El Nino events and weak CP El Nino events lead to an increase in severe haze days in winter over southern China. A change in the south-north transport of aerosols caused by El Nino events also play a dominate role in changing the occurrence of winter haze days in China. (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据