4.4 Review

Alterations in body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio in never and minimally treated patients with psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 420-429

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.005

关键词

Schizophrenia; Antipsychoric-naive; Untreated; Metabolic; Obesity; Weight

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Canada [MOP- 142493, 141968]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Obesity is up to 4 times higher in patients with schizophrenia than in the general population. However, the link between obesity and schizophrenia in the absence of antipsychotic use is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to examine differences in obesity measures (body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)) in antipsychotic-naive and minimally treated (up to 2 weeks of lifetime antipsychotic exposure) patients with psychosis compared to healthy controls (HCs). Methods: A systematic search was conducted using Ovid Medline (R), PsycINFO, and Embase. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) in obesity measures between groups were calculated. Separate sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the effects of age, sex, and ethnicity; antipsychotic exposure; and schizophrenia-related psychosis on SMDs. Results: A total of 23 studies were included in the meta-analysis (BMI 23, WC 9, WHR 5). BMI was lower (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.34 to -0.05, P = 0.009) and WHR was elevated (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.55, P = 0.001) in patients. These differences remained after analyses were restricted to patients matched with HCs for age, sex, and ethnicity; to antipsychotic-naive patients; and to patients with schizophrenia-related diagnoses. Conclusions: Differences in BM and WHR were observed in never and minimally treated patients with psychosis compared to HCs. future research is warranted to understand these alterations in the context of body fat biomarkers and neuropathology of psychiatric disorders, independent of the effects of antipsychotics. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据