4.4 Article

N,N-dimethylformamide: evidence of carcinogenicity from national representative cohort study in South Korea

期刊

出版社

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3802

关键词

cancer; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver cancer; lung cancer; mortality

资金

  1. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) - Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) [2017001970001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective There is limited epidemiological evidence of carcinogenicity on exposure of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). This study aimed to identify the possible association between cancer mortality and DMF exposure. Methods A cohort of 11 953 workers exposed to DMF between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2004 was studied. A urinary metabolite of DMF, N-methylformamide level (UNMFL), was used for exposure assessment. This cohort was matched with the mortality data of the Korean National Statistical Office and followed up for cancer mortality between 2000 and 2011. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) of the DMF-exposed workers with reference to Korean men were calculated. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRadj also controlling for age, other carcinogen exposure including hepatitis B and C) were calculated for the workers categorized in three exposure groups with reference to workers with no exposure. Results The HRadj of overall cancer mortality were significantly increased in workers with 7.5-<15 mg/L [HRadj 2.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-6.81] and >= 15 mg/L (HRadj 2.41, 95% CI 1.03-5.66) compared with non-exposed workers. liepatocellular carcinoma mortality (HRadj 3.73, 95% CI 1.05-13.24) of workers with >= 15 mg/L and lung cancer mortality HRadj 14.36, 95% CI 1.41-146.86) in workers with 7.5-<15 mg/L were significantly increased. Conclusions Workers with high DMF exposure showed increased mortalities for overall, liver, and lung cancer. Our results suggest that DMF causes cancer, especially hepatocellular carcinoma, which is in agreement with earlier studies on liver cancer in animal experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据