4.7 Article

Assessment of red-edge vegetation indices for crop leaf area index estimation

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 133-143

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.032

关键词

Leaf area index; Vegetation index; RapidEye, red-edge; Sensitivity analysis; Crops

资金

  1. Agriculture and Agri Food Canada [1130, 1313]
  2. NOHFC [920161]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the potential of vegetation indices (VIs) for crop leaf area index (LAI) estimation, with a focus on comparing red-edge reflectance based (RE-based) and the visible reflectance based (VIS-based) VIs. Seven VIs were derived from multi-temporal RapidEye images to correlate with LAI of two crop species having contrasting leaf structures and canopy architectures: spring wheat (a monocot) and canola (a dicot) in northern Ontario, Canada. The relationship between LAI and the selected VIs (LAI-VI) was characterized using a semi empirical model. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling method was used to estimate the model parameters, including the extinction coefficient (K-VI) and VI value for dense green canopy (VI infinity). Results showed that crop-specific regression models were much closer to a generic regression model using the RE-based VIs than using the VIS-based VIs. Furthermore, the joint posterior probability distribution of the K-VI and VI infinity of the RE-based VIs tended to converge for the two crops. This suggests that the RE-based VIs are not as sensitive to canopy structure, e.g., the average leaf angle (ALA), as the VIS-based VIs. This is also demonstrated by the sensitivity analyses using both PROSAIL simulations and field measurements. Hence, the RE-based VIs can be used to develop a more generic LAI estimation algorithm for different crops. Further studies are required to assess the impact of soil reflectance and other factors, such as illumination-target-viewing geometries and atmospheric conditions, on LAI retrieval.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据