4.7 Article

Thermal properties of Y1-xMgxTaO4-x/2ceramics via anion sublattice adjustment

期刊

RARE METALS
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 545-554

出版社

NONFERROUS METALS SOC CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s12598-019-01227-0

关键词

Ceramics; Yttrium tantalate; Mg(2+)doping; Thermal conductivity; Thermal expansion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic investigation concerned with Y1-xMgxTaO4-x/2(x = 0, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16 and 0.20, respectively) ceramics was fabricated by a solid-state reaction method and characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and thermal analysis. XRD spectra display that all of the samples are excellently consistent with the standard XRD spectrum of monoclinic YTaO4(PDF No. 24-1415; space group:I2 (5)). The Raman peaks of the samples doped with Mg(2+)just widen slightly compared with those of pure YTaO4, which are in agreement with the results of XRD. The thermal conductivity of dense 7 wt%-8 wt% yttria-stabilized zirconia (7-8 YSZ) ceramic is about 2.5 W center dot m(-1)center dot K(-1)at 900 degrees C, while the Y1-xMgxTaO4-x/2(x= 0, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16 and 0.20) ceramics possess lower thermal conductivity in the range of 1.45-1.57 W center dot m(-1)center dot K(-1)at 900 degrees C, which declines by 35% compared with that of 7-8 YSZ. The lower thermal conductivities of Y1-xMgxTaO4-x/2(x= 0, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16 and 0.20) ceramics are originated from the enhanced phonon scattering caused by oxygen vacancy and Mg(2+)ions defect complex. However, the thermal expansion coefficients are about 9.0 x 10(-6)-9.5 x 10(-6)K(-1)along with the different amounts of Mg(2+)doping at 1200 degrees C. Compared to the pure sample, the thermal expansion coefficient decreases slightly when the Mg(2+)doping amount is over 20%. The systematic investigations on the phase, microstructure, elastic and thermal properties of Y1-xMgxTaO4-x/2(x= 0, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16 and 0.20) ceramics will provide guidance for its application at high temperature, especially as thermal barrier coatings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据