4.4 Article

Comparison of thermoluminescent readers exploring different reading protocols for LiF:Mg,Cu,P (MCP-N) detectors

期刊

RADIATION MEASUREMENTS
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 61-68

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.11.011

关键词

Thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD); MCP-N; Dose-response; TLD readers; Heating rates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study we analyzed the dose response of (LiF)-Li-nat:Mg,Cu,P (MCP-N) detectors in two different TLD readers (Harshaw 5500 and Toledo 654 Vinten) at 7 dose levels, ranging from 0.5 mGy to 5 Gy, for different heating rates (2 degrees C/s, 5 degrees C/s, 10 degrees C/s and 15 degrees C/s) and using 2 protocols: one without pre-heating and a maximum reading temperature of 255 degrees C and one including external pre-heating before the readout for 20 min at 100 degrees C and maximum temperature of 230 degrees C. The results show a supralinear behavior for Harshaw 5500 reader at high doses which is more pronounced for the fast heating rates. For the 15 degrees C/s heating rate, the supralinearity starts at 2 Gy for the protocol without pre-heating and at 0.5 Gy for the protocol with pre-heating reaching up to linearity indices of respectively 1.42 +/- 0.05 and 1.67 +/- 0.05 at 5 Gy. The 2 degrees C/s heating rate does not show supralinearity up till 5 Gy. The Toledo 654 Vinten reader shows no supralinear behavior. The shape of the glow curves is different between readers and reading protocols while the glow curve peaks shift towards higher temperatures for increasing heating rates due to thermal lag effects. This study demonstrates the different behaviors of TLD readers, for different heating rates and two types of protocols with an important concern for a Harshaw reader.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据