4.4 Article

The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) Spectrographs

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab0075

关键词

Galaxy: abundances; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; instrumentation: spectrographs; techniques: radial velocities; techniques: spectroscopic

资金

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  4. University of Arizona
  5. Brazilian Participation Group
  6. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  7. University of Cambridge
  8. Carnegie Mellon University
  9. University of Florida
  10. French Participation Group
  11. German Participation Group
  12. Harvard University
  13. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  14. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  15. Johns Hopkins University
  16. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  17. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  18. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  19. New Mexico State University
  20. New York University
  21. Ohio State University
  22. Pennsylvania State University
  23. University of Portsmouth
  24. Princeton University
  25. Spanish Participation Group
  26. University of Tokyo
  27. University of Utah
  28. Vanderbilt University
  29. University of Virginia
  30. University of Washington
  31. Yale University
  32. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  33. Carnegie Institution for Science
  34. Chilean Participation Group
  35. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  36. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  37. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  38. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  39. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  40. Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  41. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  42. University of Notre Dame
  43. Observatario Nacional/MCTI
  44. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  45. United Kingdom Participation Group
  46. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  47. University of Colorado Boulder
  48. University of Oxford
  49. University of Wisconsin
  50. Levinson/Peninsula Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the design and performance of the near-infrared (1.51-1.70 mu m), fiber-fed, multi-object (300 fibers), high resolution (R = lambda/Delta lambda similar to 22,500) spectrograph built for the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE). APOGEE is a survey of similar to 10(5) red giant stars that systematically sampled all Milky Way populations (bulge, disk, and halo) to study the Galaxy's chemical and kinematical history. It was part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III (SDSS-III) from 2011 to 2014 using the 2.5 m Sloan Foundation Telescope at Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico. The APOGEE-2 survey is now using the spectrograph as part of SDSS-IV, as well as a second spectrograph, a close copy of the first, operating at the 2.5 m du Pont Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile. Although several fiber-fed, multi-object, high resolution spectrographs have been built for visual wavelength spectroscopy, the APOGEE spectrograph is one of the first such instruments built for observations in the near-infrared. The instrument's successful development was enabled by several key innovations, including a gang connector to allow simultaneous connections of 300 fibers; hermetically sealed feedthroughs to allow fibers to pass through the cryostat wall continuously; the first cryogenically deployed mosaic volume phase holographic grating; and a large refractive camera that includes mono-crystalline silicon and fused silica elements with diameters as large as similar to 400 mm. This paper contains a comprehensive description of all aspects of the instrument including the fiber system, optics and opto-mechanics, detector arrays, mechanics and cryogenics, instrument control, calibration system, optical performance and stability, lessons learned, and design changes for the second instrument.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据