4.5 Review

The Study of Psychopathology from the Network Analysis Perspective: A Systematic Review

期刊

PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS
卷 88, 期 2, 页码 71-83

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000497425

关键词

Network analysis; Network theory; Systematic review; Psychopathology; Mental disorder

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PSI2014-61744-EXP, PSI2015-69253-R, PSI2016-74987-P]
  2. UCM Predoctoral Fellowship [CT17/17-CT18/17]
  3. [PSI2014-56303-REDT-PROMOSAM]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Network analysis (NA) is an analytical tool that allows one to explore the map of connections and eventual dynamic influences among symptoms and other elements of mental disorders. In recent years, the use of NA in psychopathology has rapidly grown, which calls for a systematic and critical analysis of its clinical utility. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of published empirical studies applying NA in psychopathology, between 2010 and 2017, was conducted. We included the literature published in PubMed and PsycINFO using as keywords any combination of network analysis with the terms anxiety, affective disorders, depression, schizophrenia, psychosis, personality disorders, substance abuse and psychopathology. Results: The review showed that NA has been applied in a plethora of mental disorders in adults (i.e., 13 studies on anxiety disorders; 19 on mood disorders; 7 on psychosis; 1 on substance abuse; 1 on borderline personality disorder; 18 on the association of symptoms between disorders), and 6 on childhood and adolescence. Conclusions: A critical examination of the results of each study suggests that NA helps to identify, in an innovative way, important aspects of psychopathology like the centrality of the symptoms in a given disorder as well as the mutual dynamics among symptoms. Yet, despite these promising results, the clinical utility of NA is still uncertain as there are important limitations on the analytic procedures (e.g., reliability of indices), the type of data included (e.g., typically restricted to secondary analysis of already published data), and ultimately, the psychometric and clinical validity of the results. (C) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据