4.7 Article

Quantifying and modeling the impact of interconnection failures on the electrical performance of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules

期刊

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 424-432

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.3111

关键词

electrical model; failure mode; interconnections; module; reliability; ribbon; series resistance; solar cell

资金

  1. Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (Innosuisse-SCCER program)
  2. EOS Holding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Failures in the metallic interconnections are among the main degradation modes for photovoltaic modules. Fatigue accumulation due to thermomechanical stresses can result in deterioration of the solder joints or in broken ribbons. In this paper, we first quantify experimentally how the module performance is affected when one or more cell interconnect ribbons are cut or disconnected. For this purpose, we manufactured a set of minimodules, composed by six monocrystalline silicon cells with three bus bars connected in series. Cells were encapsulated in a glass/backsheet construction, employing a polymeric (ETFE) backsheet that can be easily opened. We then sequentially cut one or more ribbons. We observe that the power loss strongly depends on the ribbon's position with respect to the cell (external or central ribbon). In a second step, we implemented an electrical model in LT-SPICE where the solar cell is composed by three subcells (as the number of cell bus bars) and show that this model is able to reproduce the experimental results with a good accuracy. We then use the model to demonstrate that these results are directly transferable to the case of large-area modules composed of 60 or 72 cells. Finally, we analyze the case when the disconnections are randomly distributed in the module. As a first approximation, a module with 10% of disconnections has a P-max variation between -1.34% and -2.75% in average, while 20% of disconnections lead to a P-max variation in the range of -2.83% and -5.64%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据