4.7 Article

All sub-nanosecond laser monolithic interconnection of OPV modules

期刊

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 479-490

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.3115

关键词

flexible organic photovoltaic module; laser patterning; sub-nanosecond pulses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although green femtosecond lasers provide outstanding quality and wide processing windows for monolithic interconnection of the individual cells in organic photovoltaic (OPV) modules, they are hardly used in commercial applications, due to cost reasons. In this work, a process has been developed that allows the monolithic interconnection in OPV modules with an infrared sub-nanosecond laser exclusively, without compromising the performance of the modules. While the photoactive layer is removed easily by green femtosecond pulses without damaging the bottom electrode, this is not possible for infrared nanosecond pulses, due to their much larger optical penetration length, which significantly exceeds the thickness of the active layer and is well absorbed by the indium tin oxide (ITO) layer. This leads to damage of the ITO bottom electrode, which in turn compromises the functionality of the module. By systematically varying single-pulse laser fluence and spatial pulse overlap, the laser parameters are optimized in such a way that the contact area between the residues of the metal oxide bottom electrode and the silver nanowire top electrode is maximized so that the electrical resistances of the contacts are sufficiently small not to affect device performance. This is demonstrated by presenting large-area OPV modules based on the well-characterized reference system P3HT:PCBM that show efficiencies of up to 2.4%. This achievement opens up the way towards reliable roll-to-roll (R2R) laser patterning processes with sub-nanosecond lasers and thus represents a breakthrough with respect to cost-effective R2R manufacturing of OPV modules, due to grossly reduced investment and maintenance costs for laser sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据