4.4 Review

Current status of r-process nucleosynthesis

期刊

PROGRESS IN PARTICLE AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 109-166

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.02.008

关键词

nucleosynthesis; r process; astrophysics theory; nuclear experiment; astronomical observation

资金

  1. JSPS, Japan [15H03665, 17K05459]
  2. DOE, USA [DE-FG02-95-ER40934]
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation, USA [PHY-1514695, PHY-1806368, PHY-1712832]
  4. Core Fulbright U.S. Scholar Program, USA
  5. visiting professor program at the NAOJ, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid neutron capture process (r process) is believed to be responsible for about half of the production of the elements heavier than iron and contributes to abundances of some lighter nuclides as well. A universal pattern of r-process element abundances is observed in some metal-poor stars of the Galactic halo. This suggests that a well-regulated combination of astrophysical conditions and nuclear physics conspires to produce such a universal abundance pattern. The search for the astrophysical site for r-process nucleosynthesis has stimulated interdisciplinary research for more than six decades. There is currently much enthusiasm surrounding evidence for r-process nucleosynthesis in binary neutron star mergers in the multi-wavelength follow-up observations of kilonovalgravitational-wave GRB170807A/GW170817. Nevertheless, there remain questions as to the contribution over the history of the Galaxy to the current solar-system r-process abundances from other sites such as neutrino-driven winds or magnetohydrodynamical ejection of material from core-collapse supernovae. In this review we highlight some current issues surrounding the nuclear physics input, astronomical observations, galactic chemical evolution, and theoretical simulations of r-process astrophysical environments with the goal of outlining a path toward resolving the remaining mysteries of the r process. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据