4.8 Article

Age-related inflammation triggers skeletal stem/progenitor cell dysfunction

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810692116

关键词

regeneration; skeletal stem cell; senescence; inflammation; bone healing

资金

  1. NIH [S10 OD010751]
  2. NIH/National Cancer Institute [P30CA016087]
  3. NIH/National Institute on Aging [1R01AG056169]
  4. NIH/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin [K08AR069099]
  5. Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation
  6. Orthopaedic Trauma Association - Zimmer Biomet, Depuy Synthes
  7. Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging is associated with impaired tissue regeneration. Stem cell number and function have been identified as potential culprits. We first demonstrate a direct correlation between stem cell number and time to bone fracture union in a human patient cohort. We then devised an animal model recapitulating this age-associated decline in bone healing and identified increased cellular senescence caused by a systemic and local proinflammatory environment as the major contributor to the decline in skeletal stem/progenitor cell (SSPC) number and function. Decoupling age-associated systemic inflammation from chronological aging by using transgenic Nfkb1KO mice, we determined that the elevated inflammatory environment, and not chronological age, was responsible for the decrease in SSPC number and function. By using a pharmacological approach inhibiting NF-kappa B activation, we demonstrate a functional rejuvenation of aged SSPCs with decreased senescence, increased SSPC number, and increased osteogenic function. Unbiased, whole-genome RNA sequencing confirmed the reversal of the aging phenotype. Finally, in an ectopic model of bone healing, we demonstrate a functional restoration of regenerative potential in aged SSPCs. These data identify aging-associated inflammation as the cause of SSPC dysfunction and provide mechanistic insights into its reversal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据