4.8 Article

Transitions between foot postures are associated with elevated rates of body size evolution in mammals

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1814329116

关键词

mammals; posture; locomotion; phylogenetic comparative methods; evolution

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [17K14411]
  2. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2017-071]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L018594/1]
  4. BBSRC [BB/L018594/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K14411] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Terrestrial mammals have evolved various foot postures: flatfooted (plantigrady), tiptoed (digitigrady), and hooved (unguligrady) postures. Although the importance of foot posture on ecology and body size of mammalian species has been widely recognized, its evolutionary trajectory and influence on body size evolution across mammalian phylogeny remain untested. Taking a Bayesian phylogenetic approach combined with a comprehensive dataset of foot postures in 880 extant mammalian species, we investigated the evolutionary history of foot postures and rates of body size evolution, within the same posture and at transitions between postures. Our results show that the common ancestor of mammals was plantigrade, and transitions predominantly occurred only between plantigrady and digitigrady and between digitigrady and unguligrady. At the transitions between plantigrady and digitigrady and between digitigrady and unguligrady, rates of body size evolution are significantly elevated leading to the larger body masses of digitigrade species (similar to 1 kg) and unguligrade species (similar to 78 kg) compared with their respective ancestral postures [plantigrady (similar to 0.75 kg) and digitigrady]. Our results demonstrate the importance of foot postures on mammalian body size evolution and have implications for mammalian body size increase through time. In addition, we highlight a way forward for future studies that seek to integrate morphofunctional and macroevolutionary approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据