4.8 Article

Structure-based development of new RAS-effector inhibitors from a combination of active and inactive RAS-binding compounds

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1811360116

关键词

cancer; RAS; drugs; antibody; intracellular antibody

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I037210/1, EP/I037172/1]
  2. Wellcome Trust [099246/Z/12/Z, 100842/Z/12/Z]
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/J000612/1]
  4. Bloodwise [12051]
  5. EPSRC [EP/I037210/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MR/J000612/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The RAS gene family is frequently mutated in human cancers, and the quest for compounds that bind to mutant RAS remains a major goal, as it also does for inhibitors of protein-protein interactions. We have refined crystallization conditions for KRAS(169)(Q61H)-yielding crystals suitable for soaking with compounds and exploited this to assess new RAS-binding compounds selected by screening a protein-protein interaction-focused compound library using surface plasmon resonance. Two compounds, referred to as PPIN-1 and PPIN-2, with related structures from 30 initial RAS binders showed binding to a pocket where compounds had been previously developed, including RAS effector protein-protein interaction inhibitors selected using an intracellular antibody fragment (called Abd compounds). Unlike the Abd series of RAS binders, PPIN-1 and PPIN-2 compounds were not competed by the inhibitory anti-RAS intracellular antibody fragment and did not show any RAS-effector inhibition properties. By fusing the common, anchoring part from the two new compounds with the inhibitory substituents of the Abd series, we have created a set of compounds that inhibit RAS-effector interactions with increased potency. These fused compounds add to the growing catalog of RAS protein-protein inhibitors and show that building a chemical series by crossing over two chemical series is a strategy to create RAS-binding small molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据