4.8 Article

Human coronaviruses OC43 and HKU1 bind to 9-O-acetylated sialic acids via a conserved receptor-binding site in spike protein domain A

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809667116

关键词

coronavirus; spike; 9-O-acetylated sialic acid; OC43; HKU1

资金

  1. TOP Project - ZonMW [40-00812-98-13066]
  2. TOP-Punt Grant of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [718.015.003]
  3. China Scholarship Council [2014-03250042]
  4. ECHO Grant of the Council for Chemical Sciences of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [711.011.006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human betacoronaviruses OC43 and HKU1 are endemic respiratory pathogens and, while related, originated from independent zoonotic introductions. OC43 is in fact a host-range variant of the species Betacoronavirus-1, and more closely related to bovine coronavirus (BCoV)-its presumptive ancestor-and porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus (PHEV). The beta 1-coronaviruses (beta 1CoVs) and HKU1 employ glycan-based receptors carrying 9-O-acetylated sialic acid (9-O-Ac-Sia). Receptor binding is mediated by spike protein S, the main determinant of coronavirus host specificity. For BCoV, a crystal structure for the receptor-binding domain S1(A) is available and for HKU1 a cryoelectron microscopy structure of the complete S ectodomain. However, the location of the receptor-binding site (RBS), arguably the single-most important piece of information, is unknown. Here we solved the 3.0-angstrom crystal structure of PHEV S1(A). We then took a comparative structural analysis approach to map the beta 1CoV S RBS, using the general design of 9-O-Ac-Siabinding sites as blueprint, backed-up by automated ligand docking, structure-guided mutagenesis of OC43, BCoV, and PHEV S1(A), and infectivity assays with BCoV-S-pseudotyped vesicular stomatitis viruses. The RBS is not exclusive to OC43 and related animal viruses, but is apparently conserved and functional also in HKU1 S1(A). The binding affinity of the HKU1 S RBS toward short sialoglycans is significantly lower than that of OC43, which we attribute to differences in local architecture and accessibility, and which may be indicative for differences between the two viruses in receptor fine-specificity. Our findings challenge reports that would map the OC43 RBS elsewhere in S1(A) and that of HKU1 in domain S1(B).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据