4.8 Article

Mass spectrometry: From plasma proteins to mitochondrial membranes

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820450116

关键词

membrane proteins; mass spectrometry; biophysics

资金

  1. European Research Council [69551-ENABLE]
  2. Wellcome Trust Investigator Award [104633/Z/14/Z]
  3. Medical Research Council Programme Grant MRC [MR/N020413/1]
  4. MRC [MR/N020413/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this Inaugural Article, I trace some key steps that have enabled the development of mass spectrometry for the study of intact protein complexes from a variety of cellular environments. Beginning with the preservation of the first soluble complexes from plasma, I describe our early experiments that capitalize on the heterogeneity of subunit composition during assembly and exchange reactions. During these investigations, we observed many assemblies and intermediates with different subunit stoichiometries, and were keen to ascertain whether or not their overall topology was preserved in the mass spectrometer. Adapting ion mobility and soft-landing methodologies, we showed how ring-shaped complexes could survive the phase transition. The next logical progression from soluble complexes was to membrane protein assemblies but this was not straightforward. We encountered many pitfalls along the way, largely due to the use of detergent micelles to protect and stabilize complexes. Further obstacles presented when we attempted to distinguish lipids that copurify from those that are important for function. Developing new experimental protocols, we have subsequently defined lipids that change protein conformation, mediate oligomeric states, and facilitate downstream coupling of G protein-coupled receptors. Very recently, using a radical method-ejecting protein complexes directly from native membranes into mass spectrometers-we provided insights into associations within membranes and mitochondria. Together, these developments suggest the beginnings of mass spectrometry meeting with cell biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据