4.7 Article

Fine particle alteration monitoring in flue gas at the convection pass inlet of a commercial circulating fluidized bed combustion boiler during solid recovered fuel combustion

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 343, 期 -, 页码 747-753

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.11.053

关键词

Circulating fluidized bed combustion; Ammonium sulfate; Borax solution; Clinker; Fine particles

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20153030101360]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20153030101360] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and effective method of fine particle sampling at the convection pass inlet in a boiler that burns solid recovered fuel is developed and demonstrated. The fine particles, which are assumed to be mineral salt in flue gas, easily combine with other fly ashes and then attach to the superheater tubes and form clinkers. This clinker deposits on the tubes cause deterioration of the boiler performance and lead to tube corrosion. Two commercially available chemical agents, ammonium sulfate ((NH4)(2)SO4) and borax solution, used for clinker control are tested to monitor their activity on clinker formation. When ammonium sulfate is applied, the PM2.5 particles of fly ash collected in the convection pass inlet increased. When borax solution is used, the PM10 particles are almost completely removed. The borax solution seems to absorb molten salt in the flue gas and make fine particles grow, whereas ammonium sulfate increases the 2.5 mu m particles by changing the metal chlorides to metal sulfates. The borax solution shows potential to control fine particles, and especially PM10 particles. However, both additives increased sub-70 mu m particles of convection pass bottom ash. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据