4.6 Article

Effect of the tip length of multi-branched AuNFs on the detection performance of immunochromatographic assays

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 8, 期 16, 页码 3316-3324

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ay03274a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB127804]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271863]
  3. Training Plan for the Main Subject of Academic Leaders of Jiangxi Province [20142BCB22004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The traditional immunochromatographic assay (ICA) using conventional spherical gold nanoparticles (AuNSs, 30-40 nm) as labeled probes usually suffers from low sensitivity because of insufficient probe optical intensity. Previously, we demonstrated that larger gold nanoflowers (AuNFs, 75 nm) possessing higher optical brightness can greatly improve ICA sensitivity over conventional AuNSs. However, the improved mechanism which resulted from either larger diameter or longer tips or both is not clear. To elaborate the influence of the tip length on the sensitivity of ICA, three types of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with similar diameters in the range of 30-40 nm, including conventional AuNSs (no tip), shorttip AuNFs (tip length, 7-8 nm), and long-tip AuNFs (tip length, 13-15 nm), were synthesized. Results showed that long-tip AuNFs as labeled probes exhibited the highest signal enhancement in ICA because of the strongest optical absorbance and highest affinity to the sample. The cut-off limit (for visual qualitative detection), half maximum inhibitory concentration, and detection limit (for quantitative analysis) of long-tip AuNF-based strips were 2, 0.61, and 0.07 ng mL(-1) which are 2.5, 2.75, and 4.14 times lower than those of AuNS-based strips, respectively. Additionally, compared with conventional AuNSs, only 20% of long-tip AuNF probes and antibodies were consumed for each strip, which significantly reduce manufacturing costs in the large-scale production. Obviously, long-tip AuNFs show great application potential as an alternative to traditional AuNSs in the ICA platform.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据