4.6 Article

Synergistic Effect of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells and Fat Graft on Wrinkles in Aged Mice

期刊

PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
卷 143, 期 6, 页码 1637-1646

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005625

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The authors investigated the synergistic effects of adipose-derived stem cells and fat graft on skin wrinkles in a nude mouse model of chronologic aging. Methods: After 50 weeks of chronologic aging, 44 female BALB/c nude mice were classified into four groups: (1) negative control, (2) mice injected subcutaneously with fat on the back skin (0.5 cm(3)), (3) mice injected with adipose-derived stem cells (1 x 10(5) cells in 0.5 cm(3) Hanks balanced salt solution), and (4) mice injected with both fat (0.5 cm(3)) and adipose-derived stem cells (1 x 10(5) cells in 0.5 cm(3) Hanks balanced salt solution). The degree of wrinkling was evaluated using replica analysis, and skin biopsies were performed after 4 weeks. The dermal thickness and density of collagen were determined. Type I procollagen and matrix metalloproteinase levels were determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis. Tropoelastin, fibrillin-1, and CD31 levels were evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Results: Based on the total wrinkle area, there was significant wrinkle reduction in the fat-treated and adipose-derived stem cell with fat-treated groups. Type I procollagen mRNA and collagen levels were significantly higher in the adipose-derived stem cell with fat-treated group than in the adipose-derived stem cell-treated and the fat-treated groups. In addition, the adipose-derived stem cells with fat graft group exhibited significantly higher CD31 expression level than the adipose-derived stem cell-treated and the fat-treated groups. Conclusion: Both adipose-derived stem cells and fat graft have a wrinkle-reducing effect and synergistically affect collagen synthesis and neovascularization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据