4.4 Article

Humidity effects on the ground-level resultant electric field of positive DC conductors

期刊

PLASMA SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab0a3f

关键词

corona discharge; humidity; electric field

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0900800]
  2. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation [151058]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Power Transmission Technology [GEIRI-SKL-2018-014]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019MS011]
  5. Young Elite Scientists Sponsership Program by CAST [2016QNRC001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of humidity on the ground-level resultant electric field around positive DC conductors were studied both experimentally and numerically. Experiments were carried out in an artificial climate chamber, the results of which showed that the photon count and the ground-level resultant electric field strength both increased with increasing relative humidity. Numerical calculations for different values of relative humidity were carried out, including solutions of the positive corona inception voltage and the ion-flow field, for which a photoionization model and the upstream finite element method were employed, respectively. In order to analyze the effects of humidity, three main factors were considered: the ionization coefficient, the attachment coefficient in the photoionization model and the modified ion mobility of the charged water particles. The results indicated that, with increasing relative humidity, increasing values of the effective ionization coefficient were responsible for a reduction in the inception voltage, and the reduction reinforced the ground-level resultant electric field. Moreover, due to the charged water particles and the lower ion mobility with increasing relative humidity, the space charge density distribution was enhanced, which also strengthened the ground-level resultant electric field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据