4.8 Article

Signatures of Quark-Hadron Phase Transitions in General-Relativistic Neutron-Star Mergers

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 122, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.061101

关键词

-

资金

  1. PHAROS
  2. COST Action [CA16214]
  3. LOEWE-Program in HIC for FAIR
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [671698]
  5. ERC Synergy Grant BlackHoleCam: Imaging the Event Horizon of Black Holes [610058]
  6. National Science Foundation [PHY-1748621]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Merging binaries of neutron-stars are not only strong sources of gravitational waves, but also have the potential of revealing states of matter at densities and temperatures not accessible in laboratories. A crucial and long-standing question in this context is whether quarks are deconfined as a result of the dramatic increase in density and temperature following the merger. We present the first fully general-relativistic simulations of merging neutron-stars including quarks at finite temperatures that can be switched off consistently in the equation of state. Within our approach, we can determine clearly what signatures a quark-hadron phase transition would leave in the gravitational-wave signal. We show that if after the merger the conditions are met for a phase transition to take place at several times nuclear saturation density, they would lead to a postmerger signal considerably different from the one expected from the inspiral, that can only probe the hadronic part of the equations of state, and to an anticipated collapse of the merged object. We also show that the phase transition leads to a very hot and dense quark core that, when it collapses to a black hole, produces a ringdown signal different from the hadronic one. Finally, in analogy with what is done in heavy-ion collisions, we use the evolution of the temperature and density in the merger remnant to illustrate the properties of the phase transition in a QCD phase diagram.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据