4.8 Article

How Robust is the N=34 Subshell Closure? First Spectroscopy of 52Ar

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 122, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.072502

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council through the ERC [MINOS-258567]
  2. Enhanced Eurotalents program - CEA [PCOFUND-GA-2013-600382]
  3. European Union
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [279384907-SFB 1245]
  5. U.S. NSF [1415656]
  6. U.S. DOE [DE-FG02-08ER41533]
  7. NSERC
  8. National Research Council Canada
  9. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship from the European Union [H2020-MSCA-IF-2015-705023]
  10. Croatian Science Foundation
  11. Vietnam MOST through the Physics Development Program [DTDLCN.25/18]
  12. NRF - Korea government [2017R1A2B2012382, 2018R1A5A1025563]
  13. JSPS KAKENHI [16H02179]
  14. MEXT KAKENHI [24105005, 18H05404]
  15. Office of Nuclear Physics, U.S. Department of Energy [de-sc0018223]
  16. Office of Science of the Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  17. HIC for FAIR
  18. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A5A1025563, 2017R1A2B2012382] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  19. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H05404] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first gamma-ray spectroscopy of Ar-52, with the neutron number N = 34, was measured using the K-53(p, 2p) one-proton removal reaction at similar to 210 MeV/u at the RIBF facility. The 2(1)(+) excitation energy is found at 1656(18) keV, the highest among the Ar isotopes with N > 20. This result is the first experimental signature of the persistence of the N = 34 subshell closure beyond Ca-54, i.e., below the magic proton number Z = 20. Shell-model calculations with phenomenological and chiral-effective-field-theory interactions both reproduce the measured 2(1)(+) systematics of neutron-rich Ar isotopes, and support a N = 34 subshell closure in Ar-52.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据