4.7 Review

Bakuchiol: A newly discovered warrior against organ damage

期刊

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 208-213

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.01.001

关键词

Bakuchiol; Oxidative stress; Inflammation; Antibacterial; Ischemia-reperfusion injury

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871607, 81700236, 81600306, 81500263]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2018JM3042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bakuchiol (BAK), [(1E,3S)-3-ethenyl-3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien-1-yl]phenol is a prenylated phenolic monoterpene extracted from the fruit of Psoralea corylifolia L., which belongs to the Leguminosae plant family. Previous research has shown that BAK exerts a variety of pharmacological effects, including antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antiaging and estrogen-like effects. In addition, recent studies have indicated that BAK exerts protective effects in the heart, liver, skin and other organs. BAK treatment protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury through modulating cardioprotective pathways. BAK also inhibits liver fibrosis via promoting myofibroblast apoptosis and relieves the hepatotoxicity of multiple toxicants by suppressing oxidative stress and inflammatory changes. BAK inhibits the proliferation of various cancer cells, including stomach, breast and skin cancer cells, thereby exerting anticancer effects. Further, BAK effectively slows skin aging by preserving skin collagen. BAK treatment can protect against bone loss and delay osteoporosis by exerting estrogen-like effects. In addition, BAK remarkably reduces blood glucose and triglycerides and might be a potential pharmacological agent that can be used to protect against pancreatic beta-cell damage and diabetes progression. In this review, the pharmacological mechanisms and protective effects of BAK in human diseases are discussed, with a focus on the protective effects of BAK in the heart, liver and other important organs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据