4.7 Article

Biochemical and toxicological investigation of karanjin, a bio-pesticide isolated from Pongamia seed oil

期刊

PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 108-121

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.03.011

关键词

Bovine serum albumin; Karanjin; Bio-pesticide; Forster resonance energy transfer; Cytotoxicity and computational docking

资金

  1. MHRD, Government of India
  2. NITC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Karanjin, a furanoflavonol from Pongamia pinnata L is used in agricultural practices for its pesticidal, insecticidal and acaricidal activities. It is commercially available as a bio-pesticide targeting a wide variety of pests. The present study was intended to evaluate the biochemical interactions of karanjin with bovine serum albumin (BSA) and study its toxicological effects on mammalian and bacterial cell lines. Karanjin bound to BSA at a single site with a dissociation constant of 19.7 mu M. Evaluation of BSA-karanjin interactions at three different temperatures indicated the involvement of static mode of quenching. Binding experiments in the presence of warfarin and computational docking analysis indicated that karanjin bound closer to the warfarin binding site located in the Subdomain IIA of BSA. Using Forster resonance energy transfer analysis the distance between TRP 213 of BSA and karanjin was found to be 20 angstrom. Collective results from synchronous fluorescence spectra analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and circular dichroism analysis indicated that binding of karanjin induced conformational changes in the secondary structure of BSA. Karanjin exhibited low toxicity against human cervical cancer cells and normal mouse fibroblast L929 cells and modestly inhibited the growth of B. subtilis and E. coli cells. The data presented in this study provides insights for understanding the binding interactions of karanjin with BSA and its possible toxicological effects on mammalian cell lines and bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据