Multidisciplinary surgical strategy for dumbbell neuroblastoma: A single-center experience of 32 cases

Introduction Prognosis of dumbbell neuroblastoma (NBL) is mainly determined by the sequelae induced by the tumor itself and the neurosurgical approach. However, after primary chemotherapy, surgical management of the residual tumor, especially the spinal canal component, remains controversial. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study over the last 15 years (2002-2017) including patients treated for NBL with spinal canal extension focusing on timing and type of surgery, complications, and functional and oncological follow-up. Results Thirty-two children (14 M, 18 F) were managed for NBL, with the majority (26) presenting with NBL stroma poor while four had ganglioneuroblastoma intermixed, one nodular, and one ganglioneuroma. All but two patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Upfront laminotomy for spinal cord decompression was performed in two patients; nine patients had extraspinal surgery with a follow-up neurosurgical procedure in seven cases; eight patients had initial neurosurgery followed by an extraspinal procedure, while six patients underwent a combined multidisciplinary approach. With a median follow up of 3.6 years (0.1-14.9), 29 patients (90.6) are alive and two out of three (19, 65.5%) have functional sequelae. Conclusion Patients with NBL with persistent spinal canal extension of the tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated at our center had outcomes that compare favorably with the literature. This is likely due to the multidisciplinary approach to optimal surgical strategy and continuous evaluation of the respective risks of tumor progression. Neurological disability results from initial spinal cord compression or the radicular sacrifice required for tumor resection.