4.7 Article

Cross-spectral iris recognition using CNN and supervised discrete hashing

期刊

PATTERN RECOGNITION
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 85-98

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.08.010

关键词

Cross-spectral; Iris recognition; Deep learning; Convolutional neural network; Hashing

资金

  1. Research Grant Council of Hong Kong [PolyU 152068/14E (B-Q43X)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Completely automated iris recognition has emerged as an integral part of e-business and e-governance infrastructure which has acquired billions of iris images under near-infrared illumination to establish the identity of individuals. A range of e-business and surveillance applications can provide iris images that are acquired under visible illumination. Therefore, development of accurate cross-spectral iris matching capabilities is highly desirable. This paper investigates cross-spectral iris recognition using a range of deep learning architectures. Our experimental results on two publicly available cross-spectral iris databases, from 209 and 120 different subjects respectively, indicate outperforming results and validate our approach for the cross-spectral iris matching. Our observations indicate that the self-learned features generated from the convolution neural networks (CNN) are generally sparse and offer great potential for template compression. Therefore, this paper also introduces the iris recognition with supervised discrete hashing that can not only achieve more accurate performance but also offer a significant reduction in the size of iris templates. Most accurate cross-spectral matching performance is achieved by incorporating supervised discrete hashing on the features learned from the trained CNN with softmax cross-entropy loss. The proposed approach not only achieves outperforming results over other considered CNN architecture but also offers significantly reduced template size as compared with the other iris recognition methods available in the literature. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据