4.3 Article

Exponential integrators with parallel-in-time rational approximations for the shallow-water equations on the rotating sphere

期刊

PARALLEL COMPUTING
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 56-65

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.parco.2019.01.005

关键词

Non-linear shallow-water equations; Parallel-in-time; High-performance computing; Exponential integrators; Time splitting methods; Rational approximations; Spherical harmonics

资金

  1. NCAR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High performance computing trends towards many-core systems are expected to continue over the next decade. As a result, parallel-in-time methods, mathematical formulations which exploit additional degrees of parallelism in the time dimension, have gained increasing interest in recent years. In this work we study a massively parallel rational approximation of exponential integrators (REXI). This method replaces a time integration of stiff linear oscillatory and diffusive systems by the sum of the solutions of many decoupled systems, which can be solved in parallel. Previous numerical studies showed that this reformulation allows taking arbitrarily long time steps for the linear oscillatory parts. The present work studies the non-linear shallow-water equations on the rotating sphere, a simplified system of equations used to study properties of space and time discretization methods in the context of atmospheric simulations. After introducing time integrators, we first compare the time step sizes to the errors in the simulation, discussing pros and cons of different formulations of REXI. Here, REXI already shows superior properties compared to explicit and implicit time stepping methods. Additionally, we present wallclock-time-to-error results revealing the sweet spots of REXI obtaining either an over 6 x higher accuracy within the same time frame or an about 3 x reduced time-to-solution for a similar error threshold. Our results motivate further explorations of REXI for operational weather/climate systems. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据