4.4 Article

Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 65-74

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004

关键词

Anxiety; Emotion; Interoception; Perception; Predictive coding; Metacognition

资金

  1. Dr. Mortimer and Dame Theresa Sackler Foundation
  2. ERC [324150]
  3. EU [FP7-ICT-2009-05, 258749]
  4. EPSRC [EP/G007543/1, EP/L005131/1]
  5. EPSRC [EP/G007543/1, EP/L005131/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L005131/1, EP/G007543/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [324150] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interoception refers to the sensing of internal bodily changes. Interoception interacts with cognition and emotion, making measurement of individual differences in interoceptive ability broadly relevant to neuropsychology. However, inconsistency in how interoception is defined and quantified led to a three-dimensional model. Here, we provide empirical support for dissociation between dimensions of: (1) interoceptive accuracy (performance on objective behavioural tests of heartbeat detection), (2) interoceptive sensibility (self-evaluated assessment of subjective interoception, gauged using interviews/questionnaires) and (3) interoceptive awareness (metacognitive awareness of interoceptive accuracy, e. g. confidence-accuracy correspondence). In a normative sample (N = 80), all three dimensions were distinct and dissociable. Interoceptive accuracy was only partly predicted by interoceptive awareness and interoceptive sensibility. Significant correspondence between dimensions emerged only within the sub-group of individuals with greatest interoceptive accuracy. These findings set the context for defining how the relative balance of accuracy, sensibility and awareness dimensions explain cognitive, emotional and clinical associations of interoceptive ability. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B. V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据