4.6 Article

Rhodanine-3-acetic acid containing D-π-A push-pull chromophores: Effect of methoxy group on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 386-393

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.11.041

关键词

Auxiliary electron donor; Donor-pi-Acceptor organic sensitizers; Transient absorption spectroscopy; CEM and IMVS measurements

资金

  1. UGC SAP
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [18H02079]
  3. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RG-1438-041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three organic photosensitizers (TPA-R9, J-R9, CAR-R9) comprising of triphenylamine, julolidine and carbazole with methoxy group as an additional auxiliary donor and rhodanine-3-acetic acid as an acceptor were synthesized, and used in dye-sensitized solar cells application. The impact of the different donors with additional methoxy group on the photophysical, electrochemical, and photovoltaic properties are studied. The electron transfer kinetics are investigated by transient absorption spectroscopy and impedance spectroscopy. At a fixed V-OC, the electron lifetime increases in the order of donors: julolidine < diphenylamine < carbazole which are in accordance with the order of increasing V-OC. The transient absorption decays, in the presence of an electrolyte show half-times (tau(1/2)) of 1.40, 1.98, and 3.81 mu s of CAR-R9, TPA-R9, and J-R9 respectively. The short lifetime observed for the CAR-R9 proves the highest dye regeneration by I- allowing the highest short-circuit photocurrent density of 11.29 mA cm(-2). The efficiency of sensitizers obtained without addition of TBP ranged from 3.01 to 5.40%. The CAR-R9 shows superior photovoltaic performance with a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 11.29 mA cm(-2), an open-circuit photovoltage (V-OC) of 0.656 V and a fill factor (FF) of 0.728, leading to power conversion efficiency (eta) of 5.40% under AM 1.5 irradiation (100 mW cm(-2)). An additional methoxy group significantly contributes to improving performance of the device.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据