4.5 Article

Drought alters the trophic role of an opportunistic generalist in an aquatic ecosystem

期刊

OECOLOGIA
卷 189, 期 3, 页码 733-744

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04343-x

关键词

Insects; Microcosm experiment; Precipitation; Tank bromeliad; Trophic plasticity

类别

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) CGS-D Grant
  2. NSERC MSFSS Grant
  3. NSERC
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) through the Rainwebs project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abiotic change can alter species interactions by modifying species' trophic roles, but this has not been well studied. Until now, bromeliad-dwelling tipulid larvae were thought to positively affect other macroinvertebrates via a facilitative processing chain. However, under drought, we found the opposite. We performed two microcosm experiments in which we factorially manipulated water level and predation by tipulids, and measured the effects on mosquito and chironomid larvae. The experiments differed in whether high water was contrasted with low or no water, allowing us to distinguish between the effects of desiccation stress (no water) and increased encounter rates due to compression of habitat or reductions in prey mobility (low and no water). We also included a caged tipulid treatment to measure any non-consumptive effects. As well as directly reducing prey survival, reductions in water level indirectly decreased chironomid and mosquito survival by altering the trophic role of tipulids. Our results suggest that increased encounter rates with prey led to tipulids becoming predatory under simulated drought, as tipulids consumed prey under both low and no water. When water level was high, tipulids exerted negative non-consumptive effects on prey survival. Because opportunistic predators are common throughout aquatic ecosystems, the effects of drought on the trophic roles of species may be widespread. Such restructuring of food webs should be considered when attempting to predict the ecological effects of environmental change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据