4.6 Article

The Adriatic Sea and Coast modelling suite: Evaluation of the meteotsunami forecast component

期刊

OCEAN MODELLING
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 71-93

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.02.003

关键词

Meteotsunamis; Atmosphere and ocean modelling and forecast; High-frequency model result evaluation; Adriatic Sea

资金

  1. project MESSI (UKF) [25/15]
  2. project ADIOS (Croatian Science Foundation) [IP-2016-06-1955]
  3. ECMWF Special Project (The Adriatic decadal and inter-annual oscillations: modelling component)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents the Adriatic Sea and Coast (AdriSC) Meteotsunami Forecast system, which has been developed to operationally forecast meteotsunamis - atmospherically-generated destructive ocean waves in the tsunami frequency band, in the Adriatic Sea. The challenges posed by modelling meteotsunamis are first reviewed, then the AdriSC Meteotsunami Forecast system set-up is presented in detail and finally the atmosphere and ocean model results are evaluated against 48 air pressure sensors and 19 tide gauges for six different meteotsunami events. The statistical analysis of the high-frequency model results reveals that the AdriSC atmospheric and ocean models can reproduce meteotsunami events, even though their performances highly vary depending on the event and observation location. A qualitative analysis of the maps of extreme sea level and mean sea level pressure high-frequency model results shows that even a slight shift in location (of the order of 1 to 10 km) of the atmospheric disturbances, responsible for the meteotsunami generation, results in the incapability of the ocean models to reproduce the observed floods occurring during the meteotsunami events. This study presents the first available thorough evaluation of a deterministic meteotsunami forecast system. As such, it establishes that a carefully envisioned modelling system, even if imperfect, can be implemented to reproduce and forecast meteotsunami events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据