4.7 Article

Flow-induced vibration of two elastically mounted tandem cylinders in cross-flow at subcritical Reynolds numbers

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 375-387

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.01.016

关键词

Flow-induced vibration; Tandem cylinders; Spacing ratio; Mass ratio; Galloping

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51679167, 51678548, 51579175]
  2. Vortex Hydro Energy, Inc. [DE- EE0006780]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE- EE0006780]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of experimental studies on flow-induced vibration (FIV) of two identical elastically mounted circular cylinders in tandem arrangement were carried out in a low turbulence surface water channel. The Reynolds number was between 2.86 x 10(4)-1.14 x 10(5). Both upstream and downstream cylinders with diameter of 8.89 cm and mass ratio of 1.343 were allowed to oscillate in the transverse direction. Four spacing ratios T/D = 1.57, 2.57, 3.57 and 4.57 (where T is the center-to-center spacing and D is the cylinder diameter) were selected. Two virtual spring-damping oscillators were used to conduct the tests and measure the position signals of two tandem circular cylinders undergoing FIV. The vibrations and fluid forces of the cylinders were analyzed and discussed to illustrate the mechanisms of interaction between the two cylinders. The experimental results indicate that the Fly characteristics of the upstream cylinder are similar to those of a single cylinder for T/D = 2.57, 3.57 and 4.57 when the reduced velocity does not exceed 12.0. Moreover, the FIV response of the upstream cylinder in the two tandem cylinder system with T/D = 1.57 is significantly different from that of the isolated cylinder. The vibration of and the fluid force on the downstream cylinder are obviously influenced by the upstream cylinder for the spacing range tested. Vortex-induced vibration (VIV)-like response features are observed for the downstream cylinder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据