4.8 Article

Matching tRNA modifications in humans to their known and predicted enzymes

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 5, 页码 2143-2159

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz011

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM70641, HG006753]
  2. Max Planck Society [310489-tRNAmodi]
  3. European Research Council [310489-tRNAmodi]
  4. German Research Foundation [SPP 1784]
  5. IIMCB statutory funds
  6. Polish National Science Centre [2012/04/A/NZ2/00455]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

tRNA are post-transcriptionally modified by chemical modifications that affect all aspects of tRNA biology. An increasing number of mutations underlying human genetic diseases map to genes encoding for tRNA modification enzymes. However, our knowledge on human tRNA-modification genes remains fragmentary and the most comprehensive RNA modification database currently contains information on approximately 20% of human cytosolic tRNAs, primarily based on biochemical studies. Recent high-throughput methods such as DM-tRNA-seq now allow annotation of a majority of tRNAs for six specific base modifications. Furthermore, we identified large gaps in knowledge when we predicted all cytosolic and mitochondrial human tRNA modification genes. Only 48% of the candidate cytosolic tRNA modification enzymes have been experimentally validated in mammals (either directly or in a heterologous system). Approximately 23% of the modification genes (cytosolic and mitochondrial combined) remain unknown. We discuss these unidentified enzymes' cases in detail and propose candidates whenever possible. Finally, tissue-specific expression analysis shows that modification genes are highly expressed in proliferative tissues like testis and transformed cells, but scarcely in differentiated tissues, with the exception of the cerebellum. Our work provides a comprehensive up to date compilation of human tRNA modifications and their enzymes that can be used as a resource for further studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据