4.6 Article

Topology optimization on vortex-type passive fluidic diode for advanced nuclear reactors

期刊

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 1279-1288

出版社

KOREAN NUCLEAR SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2019.03.018

关键词

Vortex-type fluidic diode; Topology optimization; CFD; Flow visualization

资金

  1. National Nuclear R&D Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science ICT & Future Planning [2016M2B2A9911846, NRF-2013M2B2B1075735]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016M2B2A9911846] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vortex-type fluidic diode (FD) is a key safety component for inherent safety in various advanced reactors such as the sodium fast reactor (SFR) and the molten salt reactor (MSR). In this study, topology optimization is conducted to optimize the design of the vortex-type fluidic diode. The optimization domain is simplified to 2-dimensional geometry for a tangential port and chamber. As a result, a design with a circular chamber and a restrictor at the tangential port is obtained. To verify the new design, experimental study and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis were conducted for inlet Reynolds numbers between 2000 and 6000. However, the results show that the performance of the new design is no better than the original reference design. To analyze the cause of this result, detailed analysis is performed on the velocity and pressure field using flow visualization experiments and 3-D CFD analysis. The results show that the discrepancy between the optimization results in 2-D and the experimental results in 3-D originated from exclusion of an important pressure loss contributor in the optimization process. This study also concludes that the junction design of the axial port and chamber offers potential for improvement of fluidic diode performance. (C) 2019 Korean Nuclear Society, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据