4.6 Article

Phylogenetic and biogeographic controls of plant nighttime stomatal conductance

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 222, 期 4, 页码 1778-1788

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15755

关键词

adaption; biogeographic; ecosystem flux; gas exchange; phylogenetic; stomata; transpiration

资金

  1. David and Lucille Packard Foundation
  2. University of Utah Global Change and Sustainability Center, NSF [1714972, 1802880]
  3. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural and Food Research Initiative Competitive Programme, Ecosystem Services and Agro-ecosystem Management [2018-67019-27850]
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1714972, 1802880] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The widely documented phenomenon of nighttime stomatal conductance g(sn) could lead to substantial water loss with no carbon gain, and thus it remains unclear whether nighttime stomatal conductance confers a functional advantage. Given that studies of g(sn) have focused on controlled environments or small numbers of species in natural environments, a broad phylogenetic and biogeographic context could provide insights into potential adaptive benefits of g(sn). We measured g(sn) on a diverse suite of species (n = 73) across various functional groups and climates-of-origin in a common garden to study the phylogenetic and biogeographic/climatic controls on g(sn) and further assessed the degree to which g(sn) co-varied with leaf functional traits and daytime gas-exchange rates. Closely related species were more similar in g(sn) than expected by chance. Herbaceous species had higher g(sn) than woody species. Species that typically grow in climates with lower mean annual precipitation - where the fitness cost of water loss should be the highest - generally had higher g(sn). Our results reveal the highest g(sn) rates in species from environments where neighboring plants compete most strongly for water, suggesting a possible role for the competitive advantage of g(sn).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据