4.8 Article

Dual Signal Amplification Electrochemical Biosensor for Monitoring the Activity and Inhibition of the Alzheimer's Related Protease β-Secretase

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 88, 期 21, 页码 10559-10565

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02659

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575165, 21375076]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan province [2015JJ1019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The protease BACE1 (the beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1) catalyzes the first step in the synthesis of beta-amyloids (A beta), peptides that accumulate in the brain in Alzheimers disease (AD). Measurement of BACE1 activity is important for the development of BACE1 inhibitors to slow or stop AD. To measure BACE1 cleavage of the electrode-immobilized substrate peptide, we developed a redox-generating hydroxyapatite (HAP) probe which generates electrochemical current by reaction of the nanoparticle with molybdate (MoO42- The probe combines alkaline phosphatase (ALP) for dual signal amplification and A beta antibody to bind the probe to the immobilized peptide substrate on the surface of the electrode. We measured the activity of BACE1 at concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 100 U/mL. The use of the dual-signal HAP-ALP probe increased the signal by an order of magnitude compared to HAP-only probe, enabling detection limits as low as 0.1 U/mL. To measure the inhibition of BACE1 activity, the BACE1 inhibitor OM99-2 was added to 25 U/mL of BACE1 in concentrations ranging from 5 to 150 nM. The observed detection limit of inhibition is 10 nM of OM99-2. These results demonstrate the capabilities of this novel biosensor to measure BACE1 activity and inhibitors of BACE1 activity. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report that reaction of HAP nanoparticles with molybdate can generate electrochemical current. This dual signal amplification strategy can be extended to other electrochemical assays and adapted for wide applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据