4.8 Article

Broad-Specificity Chemiluminescence Enzyme Immunoassay for (Fluoro)quinolones: Hapten Design and Molecular Modeling Study of Antibody Recognition

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 88, 期 7, 页码 3909-3916

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00082

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [U1301214]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [S2013030013338, 2015A030313366]
  3. Guangdong Planed Program in Science and Technology [2014TX01N250, 2010A032000001-4, 2013B051000072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On the basis of the structural features of (fluoro)quinolones (FQs), pazufloxacin was first used as a generic immunizing hapten to raise a broad-specificity antibody. The obtained polyclonal antibody exhibited :broad cross-reactivity ranging from 5.19% to 478.77% with 21 FQs. Furthermore, the antibody was able to recognize these FQs below their maximum residue limits (MRLs) in an indirect competitive chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (ic-CLEIA), with the limit of detection (LOD) ranging from 0.10 to 33.83 ng/mL. For simply pretreated milk samples with spiked FQs, the ic-CLEIA exhibited an excellent recovery with a range of 84.6-106.9% and an acceptable coefficient of variation below 15%, suggesting its suitability and reliability for the use of a promising tool to detect FQs. Meanwhile, comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) models, with statistically significant correlation coefficients (q(CoMFA)(2) = 0.559, r(CoMFA)(2) = 0.999; q2(CoMSIA) = 0.559, r(2CoMSIA) = 0.994), were established to investigate the antibody recognition mechanism. These two models revealed that in the antibody, the active cavity binding FQs' 7-position substituents worked together with another cavity (binding FQs' 1-position groups) to crucially endow the high cross-reactivity. This investigation will 'be significant for better exploring the recognition mechanism and for designing new haptens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据