4.5 Article

Identifying task-general effects of stimulus familiarity in the parietal memory network

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 31-43

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.023

关键词

FMRI; Parietal cortex; Recognition memory; Repetition enhancement; Repetition suppression

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health at the National Institutes of Health, Division of Intramural Research [ZIAMH002920]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [ZIAMH002588] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies of human memory have implicated a parietal memory network in the recognition of familiar stimuli. However, the automatic vs. top-down nature of information processing within this network is not yet understood. If the network processes stimuli automatically, one can expect repetition-related changes both when familiarity is central to an ongoing task and when it is task-irrelevant. Here, we tested this prediction in a group of 40 human subjects using fMRI. Subjects initially named 100 objects aloud in the scanner. They then repeated the same task with novel and previously-named objects intermixed (where familiarity was not task-relevant) and separately were asked to make old/new recognition decisions in response to pictures of novel and previously named objects (where familiarity was central to task completion). Accuracy was matched across conditions, and voice reaction times reflected typical behavioral priming effects. Repetition enhancement effects were restricted primarily to parietal cortex and in particular, the parietal memory network and were task-general in nature, whereas repetition suppression effects were task-dependent and occurred primarily in frontal and ventral temporal cortex. Task context effects were also present in the parietal memory network and impacted responses to both novel and familiar items. We conclude by discussing implications of these findings with respect to current hypotheses regarding parietal contributions to memory retrieval.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据