4.8 Article

Gate-based single-shot readout of spins in silicon

期刊

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 437-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-019-0400-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Army Research Office [W911NF-17-1-0198]
  2. Australian Research Council [CE170100012]
  3. NSW Node of the Australian National Fabrication Facility
  4. Horizon 2020 programme [688539]
  5. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) through a Rubicon Grant
  6. Winton Fund for the Physics of Sustainability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electron spins in silicon quantum dots provide a promising route towards realizing the large number of coupled qubits required for a useful quantum processor(1-7). For the implementation of quantum algorithms and error detection(8-10), qubit measurements are ideally performed in a single shot, which is presently achieved using on-chip charge sensors, capacitively coupled to the quantum dots(11). However, as the number of qubits is increased, this approach becomes impractical due to the footprint and complexity of the charge sensors, combined with the required proximity to the quantum dots(12). Alternatively, the spin state can be measured directly by detecting the complex impedance of spin-dependent electron tunnelling between quantum dots(13-15). This can be achieved using radiofrequency reflectometry on a single gate electrode defining the quantum dot itself(5-19), significantly reducing the gate count and architectural complexity, but thus far it has not been possible to achieve single-shot spin readout using this technique. Here, we detect single electron tunnelling in a double quantum dot and demonstrate that gate-based sensing can be used to read out the electron spin state in a single shot, with an average readout fidelity of 73%. The result demonstrates a key step towards the readout of many spin qubits in parallel, using a compact gate design that will be needed for a large-scale semiconductor quantum processor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据