4.8 Article

Neoadjuvant nivolumab modifies the tumor immune microenvironment in resectable glioblastoma

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 470-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0339-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Defense LCRP Career Development Award [W81XWH-16-1-0160]
  2. NIH Lung SPORE in Lung Cancer [P50CA196530]
  3. Stand Up To Cancer Translational Research [SU2C-AACR-DT17-15, SU2C-AACR-DT22-17]
  4. MINECO [SAF2014-52361-R, 2017-83267-C2-1-R]
  5. Fundacion de la Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer (AECC)
  6. Fundacion BBVA
  7. Bristol-Myers Squibb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma is the most common primary central nervous system malignancy and has a poor prognosis. Standard first-line treatment, which includes surgery followed by adjuvant radio-chemotherapy, produces only modest benefits to survival(1,2). Here, to explore the feasibility, safety and immunobiological effects of PD-1 blockade in patients undergoing surgery for glioblastoma, we conducted a single-arm phase II clinical trial (NCT02550249) in which we tested a presurgical dose of nivolumab followed by postsurgical nivolumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity in 30 patients (27 salvage surgeries for recurrent cases and 3 cases of primary surgery for newly diagnosed patients). Availability of tumor tissue pre- and post-nivolumab dosing and from additional patients who did not receive nivolumab allowed the evaluation of changes in the tumor immune microenvironment using multiple molecular and cellular analyses. Neoadjuvant nivolumab resulted in enhanced expression of chemokine transcripts, higher immune cell infiltration and augmented TCR clonal diversity among tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes, supporting a local immunomodulatory effect of treatment. Although no obvious clinical benefit was substantiated following salvage surgery, two of the three patients treated with nivolumab before and after primary surgery remain alive 33 and 28 months later.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据