4.8 Article

Nonlinear photoresponse of type-II Weyl semimetals

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 476-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0296-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [91750109, 11725415, 11674013, 11774010, 11704012, 11374021]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 grant) [2014CB920900]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0305601, 2018YFA0305604, 2016YFA0301004]
  4. Recruitment Program of Global Experts
  5. State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments Fund for open topics
  6. Singapore National Research Foundation under NRF [NRF-RF2013-08]
  7. MOE Tier 2 [MOE2016-T2-2-153, MOE2017-T2-2-136]
  8. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB28000000]
  9. High-performance Computing Platform of Peking University
  10. Tianhe-1 National Supercomputing Center in Tianjin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experimental manifestation of topological effects in bulk materials is attracting enormous research interest. However, direct experimental evidence of the effective k-space monopole of the Weyl nodes has so far been lacking. Here, signatures of the singular topology of the type-II Weyl semimetal TaIrTe4 are revealed in the photoresponses, which are related to divergence of the Berry curvature. TaIrTe4 exhibits a large photoresponsivity of 130.2 mA W-1-with 4 mu m excitation in an unbiased field-effect transistor at room temperature-arising from the third-order nonlinear optical response, approaching the performance of commercial low-temperature detectors. In addition, the circularly polarized galvanic response is enhanced at 4 mu m, possibly due to the same Berry curvature singularity enhancement. Considering the optical selection rule of chiral Weyl cones, this may open the door for studying and controlling the chiral polarization of Weyl fermions with an electric field in addition to the optical helicities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据