4.8 Article

Glacially sourced dust as a potentially significant source of ice nucleating particles

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 253-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-019-0314-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [15K13570, 15K16120, 16H06020, 16J08380, 16K16188, 18H04143]
  2. ArCS Project
  3. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency [2-1703]
  4. NSF [AGS-1358495]
  5. DOE SciDAC [DE-SC0006791]
  6. Cornell University
  7. NIPR
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K16188, 16J08380, 15K16120, 15K13570, 16H06020, 18H04143] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aeolian dusts serve as ice nucleating particles in mixed-phase clouds, and thereby alter the cloud properties and lifetime. Glacial outwash plains are thought to be a major dust source in cold, high latitudes. Due to the recent rapid and widespread retreat of glaciers, high-latitude dust emissions are projected to increase, especially in the Arctic region, which is highly sensitive to climate change. However, the potential contribution of high-latitude dusts to ice nucleation in Arctic low-level clouds is not well acknowledged. Here we show that glacial outwash sediments in Svalbard (a proxy for glacially sourced dusts) have a remarkably high ice nucleating ability under conditions relevant for mixed-phase cloud formation, as compared with typical mineral dusts. The high ice nucleating ability of the sediments is probably governed by the presence of small amounts of organic matter (<1 wt% organic carbon) rather than mineral components. In addition, our results from intensive field measurements and model simulations indicate that the concentrations of atmospheric ice nucleating particles over the Svalbard region are expected to be enhanced in the summertime under the influence of dust emissions from Svalbard and its surroundings. We suggest that high-latitude dust sources have the potential to significantly influence glaciation of Arctic low-level clouds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据