4.8 Article

PU.1 controls fibroblast polarization and tissue fibrosis

期刊

NATURE
卷 566, 期 7744, 页码 344-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0896-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [RA 2506/3-1, RA 2506/4-1, DI 1537/9-1, DI 1537/11-1, DE 2414/2-1, AK 144/2-1, DFG FOR2438, SCHE 1583/7-1, SPP1468, CRC1181, SFB TR221]
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
  3. Marie Curie project OSTEOIMMUNE
  4. TEAM project of the European Union [305549]
  5. IMI [115142]
  6. Else Kroner-Fresenius-Stiftung [2014_A184]
  7. IZKF in Erlangen
  8. ELAN-Foundation Erlangen [16-10-05-1-Ramming]
  9. NIH [SNF310030_166259, R01 A1057459, AI095282, H1.129063]
  10. Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung [2017.129.1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibroblasts are polymorphic cells with pleiotropic roles in organ morphogenesis, tissue homeostasis and immune responses. In fibrotic diseases, fibroblasts synthesize abundant amounts of extracellular matrix, which induces scarring and organ failure. By contrast, a hallmark feature of fibroblasts in arthritis is degradation of the extracellular matrix because of the release of metalloproteinases and degrading enzymes, and subsequent tissue destruction. The mechanisms that drive these functionally opposing pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory phenotypes of fibroblasts remain unknown. Here we identify the transcription factor PU.1 as an essential regulator of the pro-fibrotic gene expression program. The interplay between transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms that normally control the expression of PU.1 expression is perturbed in various fibrotic diseases, resulting in the upregulation of PU.1, induction of fibrosis-associated gene sets and a phenotypic switch in extracellular matrix-producing pro-fibrotic fibroblasts. By contrast, pharmacological and genetic inactivation of PU.1 disrupts the fibrotic network and enables reprogramming of fibrotic fibroblasts into resting fibroblasts, leading to regression of fibrosis in several organs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据