4.8 Article

A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota

期刊

NATURE
卷 568, 期 7753, 页码 499-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0965-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)
  2. European Commission within the Research Infrastructures Programme of Horizon 2020 [676559]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N018354/1]
  4. Wellcome Trust [098051]
  5. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [1091097, 1141564]
  6. Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program
  7. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council [RGPIN-03878-2015]
  8. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1141564] Funding Source: NHMRC
  9. BBSRC [BB/N018354/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The composition of the human gut microbiota is linked to health and disease, but knowledge of individual microbial species is needed to decipher their biological roles. Despite extensive culturing and sequencing efforts, the complete bacterial repertoire of the human gut microbiota remains undefined. Here we identify 1,952 uncultured candidate bacterial species by reconstructing 92,143 metagenome-assembled genomes from 11,850 human gut microbiomes. These uncultured genomes substantially expand the known species repertoire of the collective human gut microbiota, with a 281% increase in phylogenetic diversity. Although the newly identified species are less prevalent in well-studied populations compared to reference isolate genomes, they improve classification of understudied African and South American samples by more than 200%. These candidate species encode hundreds of newly identified biosynthetic gene clusters and possess a distinctive functional capacity that might explain their elusive nature. Our work expands the known diversity of uncultured gut bacteria, which provides unprecedented resolution for taxonomic and functional characterization of the intestinal microbiota.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据