4.7 Article

A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Capsule/Ventral Striatum for Chronic Treatment-Resistant Depression

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 78, 期 4, 页码 240-248

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.11.023

关键词

Deep brain stimulation; DBS; Treatment resistant depression; TRD; Major depression; Ventral capsule/ventral striatum

资金

  1. Medtronic, Inc.
  2. Eli Lilly
  3. Cyberonics
  4. Roche
  5. Neuronetics Inc.
  6. NeoSync Inc.
  7. Cervel Neurotech Inc.
  8. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  9. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  10. NeoSync
  11. Corcept
  12. Takeda
  13. Otsuka
  14. Shire
  15. American Psychiatric Association
  16. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  17. Medtronic
  18. Pfizer
  19. Neuronetics
  20. Cervel Neurotech
  21. NIH
  22. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  23. AstraZeneca
  24. BMS
  25. CeNeRX Biopharma
  26. Sanofi
  27. Magstim
  28. NIMH
  29. Tourette Syndrome Association
  30. International OCD Foundation
  31. Tufts University
  32. Depressive and Bipolar Disorder Alternative Treatment Foundation
  33. Massachusetts General Hospital Psychiatry Academy
  34. BrainCells Inc.
  35. Clintara, LLC
  36. Systems Research and Applications Corporation
  37. Boston University
  38. Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research
  39. National Association of Social Workers Massachusetts
  40. Massachusetts Medical Society
  41. National Institute on Drug Abuse
  42. Oxford University Press
  43. DARPA
  44. National Institute on Aging
  45. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  46. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  47. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  48. Forest Research Institute
  49. Shire Development Inc.
  50. Northstar
  51. National Institutes of Health (NIH) NeoSync
  52. Butler Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Multiple open-label trials of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), including those targeting the ventral capsule/ventral striatum target, have shown encouraging response rates. However, no randomized controlled trials of DBS for TRD have been published. METHODS: Thirty patients with TRD participated in a sham-controlled trial of DBS at the ventral capsule/ventral striatum target for TRD. Patients were randomized to active versus sham DBS treatment in a blinded fashion for 16 weeks, followed by an open-label continuation phase. The primary outcome measure was response, defined as a 50% or greater improvement on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale from baseline. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in response rates between the active (3 of 15 subjects; 20%) and control (2 of 14 subjects; 14.3%) treatment arms and no significant difference between change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores as a continuous measure upon completion of the 16-week controlled phase of the trial. The response rates at 12, 18, and 24 months during the open-label continuation phase were 20%, 26.7%, and 23.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this first randomized controlled study of DBS for the treatment of TRD did not demonstrate a significant difference in response rates between the active and control groups at the end of the 16-week controlled phase. However, a range of 20% to 26.7% of patients did achieve response at any time during the open-label continuation phase. Future studies, perhaps utilizing alternative study designs and stimulation parameters, are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据