4.8 Article

Proof-of-Principle of rTLC, an Open-Source Software Developed for Image Evaluation and Multivariate Analysis of Planar Chromatograms

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 88, 期 24, 页码 12494-12501

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [172017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) is an advantageous analytical technique for analysis of complex samples. Combined with multivariate data analysis, it turns out to be a powerful tool for profiling of many samples in parallel. So far, chromatogram analysis has been time-consuming and required the application of at least two software packages to convert HPTLC chromatograms into a numerical data matrix. Hence, this study aimed to develop a powerful, all in one open-source software for user-friendly image processing and multivariate analysis of HPTLC chromatograms. Using the caret package for machine learning, the software was set up in the R programming language with an HTML user interface created by the shiny package. The newly developed software, called rTLC, is deployed online, and instructions for direct use as a web application and for local installation, if required, are available on GitHub. rTLC was created especially for routine use in planar chromatography. It provides the necessary tools to guide the user in a fast protocol to the statistical data output (e.g., data extraction, preprocessing techniques, variable selection, and data analysis). rTLC offers a standardized procedure and informative visualization tools that allow the user to explore the data in a reproducible and comprehensive way. As proof-of-principle of rTLC, German propolis samples were analyzed using pattern recognition techniques, principal component analysis, hierarchic cluster analysis, and predictive techniques, such as random forest and support vector machines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据