4.7 Article

The evolution of galaxy shapes in CANDELS: from prolate to discy

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz339

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: fundamental parameters

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. Fujian Fuguang Foundation
  3. US-Israel BSF [2014-273]
  4. GIF [I-1341-303.7/2016]
  5. NSF [AST-1405962, DIP STE1869/2-1 GE625/17-1]
  6. NASA through a grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute [HST-AR-15025, NAS5-26555, HST-GO-12060]
  7. ERC Advanced Grant, STARLIGHT: Formation of the First Stars [339177]
  8. [HST-AR-14578.001-A]
  9. [NSF-AST-1615730]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We model the projected b/a-log a distributions of CANDELS star-forming main-sequence galaxies, where a (b) is the half-light semimajor (semiminor) axis of the galaxy images measured by GALFIT. We find that smaller a galaxies are rounder at all stellar masses M-* and redshifts, so we include a when analysing b/a distributions. Approximating intrinsic shapes of the galaxies as triaxial ellipsoids and assuming amultivariate normal distribution of galaxy size and two shape parameters, we construct their intrinsic shape and size distributions to obtain the fractions of elongated (prolate), discy (oblate), and spheroidal galaxies in each redshift and mass bin. We find that galaxies tend to be prolate at low M-* and high redshifts, and discy at high M-* and low redshifts, qualitatively consistent with van der Wel et al., implying that galaxies tend to evolve from prolate to discy. These results are consistent with the predictions from simulations that the transition from prolate to oblate is caused by a compaction event at a characteristic mass range, making the galaxy centre baryon dominated. We give probabilities of a galaxy's being elongated, discy, or spheroidal as a function of its M-*, redshift, and projected b/a and a, which can facilitate target selections of galaxies with specific shapes at high redshifts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据