4.7 Article

Jets blowing bubbles in the young radio galaxy 4C 31.04

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz233

关键词

ISM: jets and outflows; ISM: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: individual: 4C 31.04; galaxies: jets; galaxies: nuclei; galaxies: active

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the discovery of shocked molecular and ionized gas resulting from jet-driven feedback in the low-redshift (z = 0.0602) compact radio galaxy 4C 31.04 using near-IR imaging spectroscopy. 4C 31.04 is a similar to 100 pc double-lobed Compact Steep Spectrum source believed to be a very young active galactic nucleus (AGN). It is hosted by a giant elliptical with a similar to 10(9)M(circle dot) multiphase gaseous circumnuclear disc. We used high spatial resolution, adaptive optics-assisted H- and K-band integral field Gemini/NIFS observations to probe (1) the warm (similar to 10(3) K) molecular gas phase, traced by ro-vibrational transitions of H-2, and (2), the warm ionized medium, traced by the [Fe II](1.)(644) (mu m) line. The [Fe II] emission traces shocked gas ejected from the disc plane by a jet-blown bubble 300-400 pc in diameter, while the H-2 emission traces shock-excited molecular gas in the interior similar to 1 kpc of the circumnuclear disc. Hydrodynamical modelling shows that the apparent discrepancy between the extent of the shocked gas and the radio emission can occur when the brightest regions of the synchrotronemitting plasma are temporarily halted by dense clumps, while less bright plasma can percolate through the porous ISM and form an energy-driven bubble that expands freely out of the disc plane. Simulations suggest that this bubble is filled with low surface brightness plasma not visible in existing VLBI observations of 4C 31.04 due to insufficient sensitivity. Additional radial flows of jet plasma may percolate to similar to kpc radii in the circumnuclear disc, driving shocks and accelerating clouds of gas, giving rise to the H-2 emission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据